There are times where a more modest database might be all that is required. While SQL Sever is a much more powerful system than Access, there are many cases where it makes more sense to use Access instead of SQL Server. They can also have a lot of people trying to access the database at the same time. So at that level, SQL Server will win every time. Medium to large organisations can have some pretty large requirements when it comes to storing data.
![microsoft access sql microsoft access sql](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-gwaB9yD2a6g/UeRl_b0L6eI/AAAAAAAAADg/UClkQhDF0tE/w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu/Remigio+huarcaya+02.fw.png)
SQL Server can have up to 2,147,483,647.įor any medium to large business, this makes SQL Server the obvious choice for enterprise level solutions and other mission-critical applications. Number of objects: Access can have a maximum of 32,768 objects per database.Simultaneous users: An Access 2016 database has a limit of 255 concurrent users, whereas each instance of SQL Server 2016 allows a maximum of 32,767 simultaneous user connections.Database size: Access databases can have a maximum size of 2 gigabytes (minus the space needed for system objects). SQL Server databases can have a maximum size a maximum size of 524,272 terabytes with a maximum data file size of 16 terabytes.SQL Server has much higher specifications than Access. And both have a large presence in organisations across the world.īut between Access and SQL Server, there are some significant differences.įirst of all, there’s the technical side.
![microsoft access sql microsoft access sql](https://support.content.office.net/en-us/media/98dfd6b0-3f28-4e2c-96b8-842de9515363.png)
Both are relational database management systems.
![microsoft access sql microsoft access sql](https://i.stack.imgur.com/LmUNh.png)
This article looks at some of the differences between Microsoft Access and SQL Server.īoth Access and SQL Server are developed by Microsoft.